---
title: "The war for OSHC: how student health cover became international education's quietest revenue battle"
description: "OSHC commissions of 25%+ built a referral-platform gold rush — OSHC Australia, EducationLink's OSHC Express, Edvisor. Then the 2025 Deed capped agent commissions. What happened, why insurers fought it, and why nobody can compare policies anyway."
date: "2026-06-11"
updated: "2026-07-03"
category: "Business strategy"
keywords: "Business strategy"
author: "Raphael Arias"
cover: "/images/blog/blog-the-war-for-oshc.jpg"
lang: "en"
wordCount: 4014
url: https://qualyhq.com/blog/the-war-for-oshc
---
## Site navigation

- [For schools](/international-education/for-schools.md) — For international education schools
- [For agents](/international-education/for-education-agents.md) — For international education agents
- [Explore](/training.md) — Watch videos on how to use Qualy
- [About](/about.md) — Learn about Qualy's mission and values
- [Pricing](/pricing)
- [5-min demo](/demo.md)
- [Login](https://dashboard.qualyhq.com)

# The war for OSHC: how student health cover became international education's quietest revenue battle

> OSHC commissions of 25%+ built a referral-platform gold rush — OSHC Australia, EducationLink's OSHC Express, Edvisor. Then the 2025 Deed capped agent commissions. What happened, why insurers fought it, and why nobody can compare policies anyway.

Every international student in Australia must buy OSHC, and for years insurers paid referral commissions — figures around 25–27% appear in submissions to the government's own review — turning health cover into one of the highest-margin line items an education agent could sell. A cottage industry of comparison-and-referral platforms grew up to industrialise that margin, and Edvisor's acquisition of EducationLink (and its OSHC Express tool) folded the revenue stream into mainstream agency software. Insurers pushed back through the 2024 Deed review, and the new Deed signed 1 July 2025 caps commissions paid to third-party agents. Meanwhile, the thing being sold remains almost impossible for a student to genuinely compare — right down to the Bupa Advantage, a cut-price couple/family product gated behind agent agreements that never appears on a comparison site.

There's a product every single international student in Australia is legally required to buy, that almost none of them choose for themselves, whose differences almost nobody can explain, and which for years paid the recommender a commission that would make a university's 10% look quaint. Overseas Student Health Cover is the most interesting market in international education that nobody writes about — so let's write about it.

## Why OSHC is a captive market

Australia requires student-visa holders to maintain OSHC for the full length of their visa — it's a visa condition, not an optional extra. Only a handful of insurers are approved to sell it, under a **Deed of Agreement with the Department of Health**: Allianz Care Australia, Medibank, ahm, Bupa, NIB, and CBHS International. The Deed standardises the floor — what OSHC must minimally cover — which is precisely what makes the market strange: a mandatory product, a government-defined minimum, six sellers, and a buyer who is seventeen-to-twenty-something, overseas, and buying health insurance for the first time in their life, usually bundled invisibly into an enrolment package.

A buyer like that doesn't shop. Whoever stands between the student and the purchase — the school's admissions office, or far more often the education agent — effectively decides. And wherever a distribution chokepoint decides a mandatory purchase, a commission appears.

## The margin that built an industry

How big a commission? Bigger than most of the industry's headline business. In submissions to the Department of Health's own review of the OSHC program, insurers describe commission arrangements for agents and intermediaries, with figures around **25–27%** of the premium appearing in the public record — and the same submissions describe agents switching their recommended insurer when a competitor offered a higher rate. Compare that with the up-to-10% a university pays on tuition (we've broken down those numbers in [how education agent commissions work](/blog/how-education-agent-commissions-work.md)) and the attraction is obvious. A family OSHC policy for a four-year visa can run well north of AUD 8,000 — at those commission levels, the health cover on a single family can out-earn the commission on a language course.

For an individual agency, manually arranging policies with one insurer was money found on the floor. The step that turned a perk into a sector was **industrialising the referral**: platforms that sit between agents and all the insurers at once, handle the policy issuance, collect the commission from the insurer, and **share the margin with the referring agent**. That's the actual product of OSHC Australia (a comparison-and-purchase portal that partners with agencies and platforms — Cohort Go, for example, ran an integration with it), of Konze's Konpare, and of **OSHC Express, built by EducationLink** — compare Bupa, Allianz, Medibank and others inside the agency's existing workflow, one click, commission flows back through the platform.

And before dismissing the platforms as pure margin-harvesting, give them their due: the convenience they sell is real, because **the insurers largely failed to build it themselves**. For products whose entire customer base is digital-native twenty-somethings overseas, the insurers' own purchase and claims experiences have been remarkably uneven — ask anyone who processes these policies weekly. NIB and Allianz run the newer, more usable stacks; Bupa's agent-and-student experience lags well behind; and the Medibank/ahm end of the market is, to put it as politely as the trade does, abysmal — clunky issuance, slow certificate generation, claims flows seemingly designed before smartphones. Every hour an insurer's portal wastes is an hour a referral platform can charge for saving. The commission bought distribution; the product gap is what made the distribution *sticky*.

Which is why the 2021 detail matters: when **Edvisor acquired EducationLink**, the deal was reported as an agency-network play. It also handed Edvisor OSHC Express, and with it a toll position on a high-margin, mandatory product flowing through thousands of agency users. For agency-software platforms whose subscription revenue is modest, embedded OSHC referral is some of the best money in the building. EdWallet handles the course payment; OSHC Express handles the health cover; each enrolment monetises twice. (We compete with Edvisor on the payments side — [here's that comparison](/compare/edvisor.md) — but credit where due: as business model design, it's clean.)

## Why the insurers fought back

Every dollar of commission is a dollar of the student's premium that didn't buy healthcare — in insurance language, it loads the premium without adding benefit. The insurers' position in the Deed review was awkward but rational: individually, none could stop paying commissions without losing the channel (the documented insurer-switching behaviour proves the channel knows its power); collectively, they could ask the referee to disarm everyone at once. Submissions to the 2024 consultation — from insurers like CBHS, HCF and Bupa, and from sector bodies — raised exactly this: rising commission costs in a mandatory product, paid to intermediaries the student often doesn't even know were involved, with the cost landing on the student.

And the referee agreed. The **new Deed for the provision of OSHC, signed 1 July 2025** and running three years, **caps commissions paid to third-party agents**, alongside other reforms (better pregnancy-related cover and clearer product disclosure among them). The explicit intent is to cut the cost of OSHC for students — though, as advocacy groups noted in their responses, that relies on insurers actually passing the savings through rather than absorbing them.

So the gold rush has a ceiling now. The referral platforms don't disappear — convenience and integration still have value, and a capped commission is still a commission — but the era of OSHC as the secret best margin in an agency's P&L is closing. Worth remembering the next time someone tells you a revenue stream in this industry is forever: the whole arc, from gold rush to cap, took roughly a decade. The ceiling has a number now — 12%, in force for policies purchased from 1 July 2026 — and we've written [a full breakdown of what the 12% era means for agency P&Ls](/blog/oshc-commission-cap-12-percent.md).

## The student's problem: nobody can actually compare these policies

Here's the layer of this fight that deserves more attention than it gets — the product itself is nearly opaque to its buyer, starting with vocabulary. Students (and plenty of counselors) use "coverage" and "policy" interchangeably, and the confusion is doing real work. The **coverage** — the minimum set of benefits OSHC must provide — is standardised by the Deed: hospital treatment, out-of-hospital medical at defined percentages of the government schedule fee, limited pharmacy, ambulance. In that sense, "all OSHC is the same" is true. The **policy** — the actual contract a specific insurer issues — differs in everything the floor doesn't fix. In that sense, "all OSHC is the same" is dangerously false. Both sentences are routinely said to students by people selling the more profitable option.

Where do policies actually differ? In the fine print that only matters when something goes wrong:

**Benefit percentages and limits.** Out-of-hospital specialist visits are typically paid at 85% of the schedule fee — but Bupa pays specialists at 100%, and is the only provider offering optional dental and optical extras. Medication limits differ too: most providers cap around AUD 50 per item, Medibank at AUD 70. A student on regular prescription medication can do that arithmetic; almost none are told to.

**Waiting periods.** Pre-existing conditions and pregnancy-related services generally carry a 12-month wait across the board. But mental health — for a cohort of young people alone in a foreign country, arguably the benefit most likely to be needed — varies: **Allianz Care and Medibank apply no waiting period for mental health services, while ahm and NIB apply two months**. That difference will never appear in a price comparison, and it's the one most likely to matter in first semester.

**The claiming experience.** The least visible difference and often the biggest: **direct billing**. Allianz maintains one of the largest networks of clinics that bill the insurer directly, so the student pays nothing upfront. With a smaller network, the student pays the doctor in cash and claims it back — trivial for a local, genuinely hard for a homesick nineteen-year-old with a foreign bank account. (Getting money *to* that student so they can pay a GP upfront is its own saga — adjacent to everything we've written about [the hidden costs of moving money in education](/blog/hidden-costs-international-payments-education.md).)

Side by side, the differences students are never shown:

| Insurer | Single cover, per year (2026, indicative) | Mental-health waiting period | Medication limit per item | Out-of-hospital specialist | Direct billing network | Stands out for |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ahm | ~AUD 623 (cheapest single) | 2 months | ~AUD 50 | 85% of MBS | Smaller | Price |
| Allianz Care | Top of the range (~AUD 800) | None | AUD 50 | 85% of MBS | Largest | Direct billing; cheapest *retail* couples/families |
| Bupa | Mid–high | — | AUD 50 | 100% of MBS | Large | Only optional dental/optical extras; the agent-gated Advantage line |
| Medibank | Mid | None | AUD 70 (highest) | 85% of MBS | Large | Medication limit; no mental-health wait |
| NIB | Mid | 2 months | AUD 50 | 85% of MBS | Mid | — |
| CBHS International | — | — | — | — | — | Smallest Deed holder; least covered by public comparisons |

*"—" = not consistently published; check the policy document. Pricing and benefits verified June 2026 from the comparison sources cited below; premiums and terms change every year, so treat this as a map, not a quote. Pre-existing-condition and pregnancy waits are typically 12 months across all providers.*

**So why is Allianz more expensive?** For single cover, it usually is — 2026 single-cover pricing across providers spans roughly **AUD 623 to 806 a year**, with ahm cheapest and Allianz toward the top. What the extra money buys is mostly the direct-billing network, the no-wait mental health cover, and the operational scale that comes from being the default provider at a large share of institutions. Whether that's worth it depends entirely on the student — and here's the detail that proves how incoherent this market is: **for couples and families, Allianz is currently the *cheapest* major retail option** (around AUD 4,600 for couples against higher rivals). The premium brand for singles is the budget brand for families. No student would guess that, no price-comparison headline conveys it, and a referral platform paid by commission has no particular incentive to explain it.

And retail isn't even the floor — which brings us to the strangest artefact in the whole market.

## The Bupa Advantage: the contract everyone wants and Bupa wishes didn't exist

Ask an agent who serves couples and families about OSHC and you'll eventually hear the words **Bupa Advantage** said in the tone normally reserved for rent-controlled apartments. Advantage is a separate Bupa OSHC product line with its own price list — publicly visible in the price sheets universities and colleges publish for their applicants — that undercuts standard retail couple and family pricing **by a wide margin**, while adding benefits most products skip, notably mental health and repatriation cover. For a family on a multi-year visa, the difference against ordinary retail pricing can run into thousands of dollars on a single policy.

The catch is distribution. You can't buy Advantage from Bupa's website. It's sold **only through education agents holding a specific agreement with Bupa** — Edvisor's own documentation notes that offering Bupa Advantage couple cover inside its insurance marketplace requires a special agreement. That scarcity created a secondary market in access: agencies without the agreement route their couple and family policies **through agencies or platforms that have one**, sub-agency arrangements stacked on top of an insurance product, each layer taking a slice of the commission for the privilege. The "precious contract" isn't a figure of speech — in some corners of the industry, *being the agency with the Advantage agreement* is a business model in itself.

Why would Bupa run a product that cannibalises its own retail family pricing? The short answer circulating in the trade: it mostly wouldn't, anymore. As the origin story is told in the industry, Advantage began life as a **university-channel product** — negotiated pricing for institutions to offer their incoming students — and only later leaked outward into agent agreements, which is exactly how legacy pricing escapes its cage: one channel's group discount becomes another channel's arbitrage. (Medibank is said to run a comparable gated arrangement of its own, but it's nowhere near as widespread — in the agent economy, "the Advantage agreement" means Bupa's.) Either way, Advantage now behaves like a relic of a more aggressive market-share era — priced to win the high-premium couple/family segment — that contract holders have clung to ever since. Agents who hold the agreements describe the tension plainly: Bupa has little appetite for extending cut-price family cover, and the agreements come wrapped in conditions. The one most often described is a **portfolio-mix obligation** — to keep writing Advantage policies, the agent is expected to deliver standard Bupa **single** policies alongside them, in proportions agents describe as roughly half and half. In other words: you may sell the cheap family product everyone wants only if you also move the full-price singles product Bupa actually profits from. (We can't point you to a published contract for that clause — these agreements are confidential, and this account reflects how holders describe them — but the structure is exactly what you'd expect an insurer to demand as the price of keeping a loss-leader alive.)

Step back and admire what this does to the student's already-impossible comparison. The true cheapest family policy in Australia isn't on any comparison site; it's gated behind a contract held by an unknown subset of agents; the agent showing it to you may be fulfilling a quota by *not* showing it to the single student standing behind you; and none of this appears in the product disclosure the new Deed worked so hard to clean up. The commission cap regulated the visible layer of OSHC distribution. The Advantage economy is a reminder of how much of the market lives in the invisible one.

That, ultimately, is the best argument for the commission cap — and also the argument the cap doesn't answer. Capping commissions removes some incentive to steer students at the margin. It does nothing to make the product comparable. The genuinely useful version of an OSHC comparison tool — one that asked about pre-existing conditions, prescriptions, pregnancy plans and mental health, then compared waiting periods and direct-billing access rather than just premiums — would be a real service. What the gold rush built instead were mostly price-and-commission routers.

## Where this leaves everyone

**Agents:** OSHC referral income survives, smaller. Treat it as a service you're accountable for, not a margin you harvest — under the new disclosure rules, the student is increasingly likely to find out what you recommended and why. Recommending on waiting periods and direct billing instead of commission rate costs you a few dollars and buys you the thing agencies actually live on: trust. And remember the refund wrinkle: OSHC is between the student and insurer, so when plans collapse, the premium comes back from the insurer separately — pro-rata, on application — never bundled into the tuition refund (the full mechanics are in our [refunds guide](/blog/international-student-refunds-five-flows.md)).

**Platforms:** the Edvisor/EducationLink playbook — own the workflow, monetise the flows through it — still works, but the OSHC flow now has a regulated ceiling, which makes the *other* flows (payments, commissions) relatively more important. Watch this space consolidate.

**Schools:** your default-provider arrangement is also a recommendation, and the same duty-of-care logic applies.

**Students:** the premium you pay includes the cost of however you were sold the policy. You can't opt out of OSHC, but you can spend twenty minutes on waiting periods and direct billing before accepting the bundle's default. The cheapest policy and the best policy are different questions; for families, sometimes — wonderfully, confusingly — they're the same answer with the expensive logo on it.

We don't sell insurance and have no OSHC referral deals — Qualy's stake here is just that OSHC premiums ride the same payment flows as tuition, and that both deserve to move transparently, [reconciled and split correctly](/features/automatic-accounting-for-ed-agents.md), at a flat fee. The OSHC war is what happens when a money flow stays opaque long enough for everyone to claim a slice. Sunlight arrived by Deed. It usually arrives eventually.

## Sources

- [Department of Health — Deed for the provision of Overseas Student Health Cover, 1 July 2025](https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/deed-for-the-provision-of-overseas-student-health-cover-1-july-2025?language=en) and the [explanatory document for insurers](https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-08/explanatory-document-for-insurers-deed-for-the-provision-of-overseas-student-health-cover-1-july-2025.pdf).
- [Department of Health consultation — Improving the Overseas Student Health Cover Program (May 2024)](https://consultations.health.gov.au/provider-benefits-integrity/improving-the-oshc-program/), including the [CBHS submission](https://consultations.health.gov.au/provider-benefits-integrity/improving-the-oshc-program/supporting_documents/cbhs-response-consultation-paper-improving-the-overseas-student-health-cover-program-may-2024pdf-1) (commission levels and insurer-switching), the [Bupa submission](https://consultations.health.gov.au/provider-benefits-integrity/improving-the-oshc-program/supporting_documents/bupa-response-consultation-paper-improving-the-overseas-student-health-cover-program-may-2024pdf-1), and the [HCF submission](https://consultations.health.gov.au/provider-benefits-integrity/improving-the-oshc-program/supporting_documents/hcf-response-consultation-paper-improving-the-overseas-student-health-cover-program-may-2024pdf-1).
- [MCWH — OSHC Deed Update Policy Response 2025](https://www.mcwh.com.au/wp-content/uploads/OSHC-Deed-Update-Policy-Response-2025.pdf): summary of the new Deed's changes, including the commission cap.
- [Edvisor — Edvisor acquires EducationLink](https://blog.edvisor.io/edvisor-acquires-educationlink) and [The PIE News coverage](https://thepienews.com/edvisor-expands-agency-network-with-educationlink-acquisition/).
- [EducationLink — OSHC Express](https://geteducation.link/oshc-express/); [OSHC Australia](https://oshcaustralia.com.au/en/govinfo); [Cohort Go + OSHC Australia](https://cohortgo.com/en/agents/oshcaustralia); [Konze Konpare](https://konze.com/products/konpare/).
- 2026 pricing and benefit comparisons: [GetMyPolicy OSHC/OVHC comparison](https://getmypolicy.online/blogs/best-oshc-and-ovhc-plans-australia-comparison) and [Student-Insurance OSHC provider comparison](https://www.student-insurance.com/insurance/australia/oshc-compare/) — single-cover range, family pricing, MBS percentages, medication limits, mental-health waiting periods, direct billing.
- Bupa Advantage: [Bupa Advantage OSHC price list (CQUniversity, effective 30 June 2023)](https://delivery-cqucontenthub.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/bupa-advantage-oshc-price-list.pdf), [ILSC-published Advantage price list](https://resources.ilsc.com/hubfs/pdf/applications-pricelists/bupa-advantage-overseas-student-health-cover-price-list.pdf), [AMET Education — Advantage couples cover](https://amet.com.au/product/bupa-advantage-oshc-couples-cover-27-months/), and [Edvisor help centre — Bupa](https://help.edvisor.io/insurance/bupa) (the special-agreement requirement). The portfolio-mix conditions described reflect agent accounts of confidential agreements, not published documents.
- [Migration Alliance — High commission rates for OVHC and OSHC](https://migrationalliance.com.au/immigration-daily-news/entry/2021-11-rmas-high-commission-rates-for-ovhc-and-oshc-when-the-borders-open.html)
- [Study Australia — Overseas Student Health Cover](https://www.studyaustralia.gov.au/en/plan-your-move/overseas-student-health-cover-oshc)

## Frequently asked questions

### What is OSHC and who has to buy it?

Overseas Student Health Cover is health insurance that every student-visa holder in Australia must maintain for the full length of their visa — it is a visa condition, not an option. Only insurers holding a Deed of Agreement with the Department of Health may sell it: Allianz Care Australia, Medibank, ahm, Bupa, NIB and CBHS International. The Deed defines the minimum benefits every OSHC product must include.

### Do education agents earn commission on OSHC?

Yes — historically among the highest commission rates in international education, with figures around 25–27% of the premium appearing in insurer submissions to the government's OSHC program review. Referral platforms industrialised this, sharing the insurer's commission with referring agents. The new OSHC Deed effective 1 July 2025 caps commissions paid to third-party agents, shrinking but not eliminating this revenue stream.

### Is all OSHC the same?

The floor is the same; the policies are not. The Deed standardises minimum coverage — hospital treatment, out-of-hospital medical at set percentages of the schedule fee, limited pharmacy, ambulance — so the worst policy still covers the essentials. But insurers differ meaningfully on specialist benefit percentages, medication limits, waiting periods (notably mental health: none at Allianz and Medibank, two months at ahm and NIB), optional extras, and the size of their direct-billing clinic networks.

### Why is Allianz OSHC more expensive?

For single cover, Allianz typically prices toward the top of the AUD 623–806 annual range. The premium buys one of the largest direct-billing networks (students pay nothing upfront at participating clinics), no waiting period for mental health services, and the scale of being the default provider at many institutions. Counterintuitively, for couples and families Allianz is currently among the cheapest options — evidence of how incoherent OSHC pricing is and why premium-only comparisons mislead.

### What is the difference between coverage and a policy?

Coverage is the set of benefits — what gets paid, at what percentage, with what limits and waiting periods. A policy is the actual contract a specific insurer issues to a specific student, which packages the Deed-mandated minimum coverage plus that insurer's particular percentages, limits, extras and claiming arrangements. "All OSHC has the same coverage floor" is true; "all OSHC policies are the same" is false — and both get quoted to students as if they meant the same thing.

### What changed in the 2025 OSHC Deed?

The Deed signed 1 July 2025, running three years, caps commissions paid to third-party agents, improves access to pregnancy-related care, and tightens product-information disclosure so students can better understand what they're buying. The cap responds to concerns raised in the 2024 review that commission costs were inflating premiums for a mandatory product; whether students see lower prices depends on insurers passing the savings through.

### What is direct billing and why does it matter?

Direct billing means the clinic charges the insurer directly, so the student pays nothing upfront. Without it, the student pays the doctor and claims reimbursement later — easy for locals, genuinely hard for a new arrival with limited cash and an unfamiliar system. The size of an insurer's direct-billing network is one of the most practically important differences between OSHC policies and one of the least visible in price comparisons.

### What is Bupa Advantage OSHC?

A separate Bupa OSHC product line, sold only through education agents holding a specific agreement with Bupa, that undercuts standard retail couple and family pricing by a wide margin while adding benefits like mental health and repatriation cover. It never appears on Bupa's website or comparison portals — universities and colleges publish its price lists for applicants, but access runs through the agent channel, and agencies without the agreement often route policies through ones that have it.

### Why can't every agent sell Bupa Advantage?

Because the product exists under restricted agreements that Bupa has little commercial interest in extending — cut-price family cover competes with its own retail pricing. Agents who hold the agreements describe conditions attached, most notably a portfolio-mix expectation of selling standard full-price single policies alongside Advantage ones, in proportions described as roughly half and half. The agreements are confidential, which is itself the point: the best family price in the market is deliberately not a public price.

### How did Edvisor get into OSHC?

By acquiring EducationLink, the Australian agency-management platform, in a deal that brought roughly 500 ANZ agencies into Edvisor's network. EducationLink had built OSHC Express, a tool letting agents compare and purchase OSHC from Bupa, Allianz, Medibank and others inside their workflow, with commission flowing through the platform. The acquisition folded a high-margin, mandatory-product referral stream into mainstream agency software.

### If a student leaves Australia early, is OSHC refunded?

Potentially yes, but by the insurer, never via the school's tuition refund. OSHC is a contract between student and insurer, so unused premium is refunded pro-rata through the insurer's own application process, typically with evidence such as a visa refusal letter or proof of departure. Students refunded tuition after a visa refusal routinely lose their OSHC refund simply because nobody tells them it's a separate claim.

## Related articles

- [How education agent commissions work: rates, gross vs net, and getting paid on time](/blog/how-education-agent-commissions-work.md)
- [International student refunds: the five flows, who pays whom, and where it goes wrong](/blog/international-student-refunds-five-flows.md)
- [The Hidden Costs of Payments in International Education: What You Need to Know](/blog/hidden-costs-international-payments-education.md)

## More on Qualy

**Industries**

- [For schools](/international-education/for-schools.md) — For international education schools
- [For agents](/international-education/for-education-agents.md) — For international education agents

**Support**

- [Training](/training.md)
- [System status](https://qualyhq.statuspage.io/) — Qualy system status
- [Product updates](https://changelog.qualyhq.com) — As we work on Qualy, here we spotlight what we’ve learned and updated across our products
- [Contact](/contact-us.md)

**Product**

- [Demo](/demo.md)
- [Enterprise](/enterprise.md)
- [Testimonials](/testimonials.md) — Learn what some customers have to say about Qualy
- [About](/about.md) — Learn about Qualy's mission and values
- [Blog](/blog) — International education payments blog by Qualy
- [Trust center](/trust.md)
- [API](/api.md) — Qualy API for international education payments
- [Zapier](/zapier.md) — Connect Qualy to 7,000+ apps with Zapier
- [NexPay](/nexpay.md) — Qualy + NexPay — automate everything around the payment

**Legal**

- [General terms](/terms-and-conditions.md)
- [Payer terms](/terms-for-payers.md)
- [Privacy policy](/privacy-policy.md)
- [BECS DDR](/becs-dd-service-agreement.md)